The Immigrant's Criminal Defense Attorney

<h3><span>Crimmigration defense — protecting your rights AND your immigration future</span></h3>

By Aaron Elinoff, Managing Partner  ·  Last updated

Understanding Crimmigration

Where Criminal Law Meets Immigration

If you're an immigrant facing criminal charges in Denver, you're fighting in two legal systems at once — and most defense firms only practice in one of them. The plea that looks like a win in criminal court can be the moment your life in the United States ends. Defense for non-citizens has to be built around that reality from day one.

At Novo Legal, we call this crimmigration defense. Our criminal defense attorneys work side-by-side with our immigration team — same firm, same case, same strategy. A plea that looks favorable in criminal court can trigger removal, foreclose paths to citizenship, or break a family apart. We evaluate both sides of the consequence before any plea decision, so the choice in front of you is the real one.

You came here to build a life. Maybe you've been here for decades, raised children who are U.S. citizens, built a business, contributed to your community. One arrest shouldn't erase all of that — but it can, if your attorney doesn't understand immigration law. That's why our approach is different. We see the whole picture, and we fight for outcomes that protect your freedom, your family, and your right to stay in the country you call home.

Related reading: Administrative closure of deportation proceedings — 2026 guide — the procedural tool for pausing a removal case after a criminal disposition is uncertain.

Why Your Immigration Status Changes Everything


The same criminal charge can have completely different consequences depending on your immigration status. A U.S. citizen might get probation and move on. An immigrant with the exact same charge could face deportation, detention, or permanent bars from re-entry.

Green Card Holders

You've done everything right. You have your green card, you pay taxes, you've built a life here. But certain criminal convictions — even misdemeanors — can make you deportable, depending on how the conviction is characterized under federal immigration law. Worse, they can make you inadmissible, meaning if you travel outside the U.S., you might not be allowed back in. We fight to protect the status you've earned.

DACA Recipients

DACA has specific criminal eligibility bars — any felony, any "significant misdemeanor" (which includes DUI, domestic violence, firearm offenses, drug distribution, and any misdemeanor with a sentence over 90 days), or three or more other misdemeanors not arising out of the same act. Whether a particular charge affects your DACA eligibility is a fact-specific analysis, and current DACA policy remains subject to ongoing litigation.

Visa Holders

Whether you're on an H-1B, F-1, B-2, or any other visa, a criminal charge can jeopardize your ability to renew, extend, or change your status. It can also affect future green card applications.

Undocumented Immigrants

If you don't have legal status, a criminal conviction can result in mandatory detention and deportation. Under certain statutory procedures — expedited removal (INA § 235(b)), reinstatement (INA § 241(a)(5)), or administrative removal based on an aggravated felony (INA § 238) — a person may be removed without a full hearing before an immigration judge. But you still have rights. You still deserve a defense. And there may be options for relief your criminal attorney doesn't know about. We know them, and we fight for every one of our clients.

03criminal-defense

Common Criminal Charges and Their Immigration Consequences

Not all crimes are treated equally under immigration law. Here's what you need to know about the most common charges we defend.

Read our full guide: DUI and Immigration Status in Colorado — the immigration-consequences playbook for every non-citizen status. For the blog-length deep-dive — including the LPR-vs.-undocumented decision split, the first 48 hours, and Colorado-specific Pozo / Kazadi post-conviction strategy — see DUI and immigration in Colorado: a permanent-resident vs. undocumented decision guide.

Drug Charges

Drug offenses are treated very seriously under immigration law. A narrow statutory exception exists to the deportability ground for a single offense involving possession for one's own use of 30 grams or less of marijuana (INA § 237(a)(2)(B)(i)). The inadmissibility analysis under INA § 212(a)(2) is separate and broader; a § 212(h) waiver may be available in limited circumstances for some offenses (including a single offense of simple possession of 30 grams or less of marijuana), subject to statutory bars. Under Mellouli v. Lynch, 575 U.S. 798 (2015), the state statute of conviction must categorically relate to a substance controlled under the federal schedules — a point frequently litigated where state and federal schedules diverge.

Domestic Violence

Convictions for crimes of domestic violence, stalking, child abuse, or violation of a protection order are deportable offenses for non-citizens who have been admitted to the U.S. — though whether a particular Colorado statute matches the federal definition is a categorical-approach question that must be analyzed case-by-case.

Theft, Fraud, and Crimes of Moral Turpitude

CIMT convictions can trigger both deportability and inadmissibility grounds, which are analyzed under separate frameworks. The one-CIMT deportability rule generally requires both (a) commission within five years after admission AND (b) that a sentence of one year or more could be imposed (INA § 237(a)(2)(A)(i)). Two or more CIMTs at any time can trigger deportability — provided they don't arise out of a single scheme of criminal misconduct (INA § 237(a)(2)(A)(ii)). A narrow "petty offense" exception may apply in inadmissibility cases under INA § 212(a)(2)(A)(ii)(II). Whether a particular Colorado offense qualifies as a CIMT is a categorical-approach question that depends on the specific statute of conviction.

Assault and Violent Crimes

Some assault offenses can be classified as "crimes of violence" aggravated felonies under INA § 101(a)(43)(F) when a sentence of one year or more is imposed. The scope of that category narrowed after Sessions v. Dimaya, 138 S. Ct. 1204 (2018), which held the residual clause of 18 U.S.C. § 16(b) unconstitutionally vague as incorporated into the INA. Courts have continued to refine the "use of force" element of § 16(a), and circuits have looked to reasoning from cases like Borden v. United States, 141 S. Ct. 1817 (2021) (an ACCA decision) in evaluating whether reckless conduct can satisfy that element. An aggravated felony conviction generally limits available relief, though withholding of removal and CAT protection may remain available in limited circumstances.

How Our Crimmigration Team Protects You

Under Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010), criminal-defense counsel has a Sixth Amendment duty to advise non-citizen clients about the immigration consequences of a plea. In Colorado, related advisement duties have been developed in People v. Pozo, 746 P.2d 523 (Colo. 1987), and Kazadi v. People, 291 P.3d 16 (Colo. 2012). Together, these authorities mean that competent criminal-defense representation of non-citizens generally requires counsel who understands both criminal and immigration law — ideally well before any plea decision.

Most criminal defense attorneys focus on one thing: the best possible outcome in criminal court. That might mean a plea deal with no jail time — a win by criminal law standards. But for immigrants, that same plea can trigger automatic deportation. It's not enough to win in criminal court. You need to win in both.

Crime Involving Moral Turpitude (CIMT) Analysis

We analyze every charge to determine whether it qualifies as a CIMT under immigration law. These determinations often depend on the specific language of the statute, not just the name of the offense. A skilled crimmigration attorney knows how to argue that a charge doesn't meet the CIMT definition — or how to negotiate a plea to a non-CIMT offense.

Aggravated Felony Prevention

Where the aggravated-felony bar does not apply, the noncitizen's strongest defense to deportation is often non-LPR cancellation of removal under INA § 240A(b)(1). Read our full eligibility guide for Form EOIR-42B.

"Aggravated felony" is a term of art under INA § 101(a)(43) that does not track the ordinary meaning of "felony." Some offenses classified as misdemeanors under state law can qualify as aggravated felonies for immigration purposes. A theft offense for which a term of imprisonment of at least one year is imposed (including a suspended sentence) may qualify under § 101(a)(43)(G), though the categorical analysis still controls. Drug-trafficking aggravated-felony classification is also a categorical-approach question; in Moncrieffe v. Holder, 569 U.S. 184 (2013), the Supreme Court held that a state marijuana-distribution conviction is not categorically an aggravated felony where the statute could be violated by distribution of a small amount for no remuneration. Coordinating criminal-defense and immigration analysis early in a case is generally the most effective way to evaluate whether a potential plea triggers an aggravated-felony classification.

Strategic Plea Negotiation

Sometimes the best outcome in criminal court is the worst outcome for immigration. Our team works together to identify plea options that satisfy prosecutors while avoiding immigration consequences. That can mean pleading to a different offense, adjusting the sentence length, or modifying the language of the plea to avoid triggering removal grounds.

Post-Conviction Relief

A prior conviction does not always foreclose immigration relief. Colorado law provides several post-conviction mechanisms, including motions under Crim. P. 35(a), 35(b), and 35(c). Under Matter of Pickering, 23 I&N Dec. 621 (BIA 2003), vacated on other grounds, Pickering v. Gonzales, 465 F.3d 263 (6th Cir. 2006), federal immigration authorities generally look to the legal basis for a state-court vacatur: a vacatur premised on a substantive or procedural defect in the underlying proceeding (for example, a Padilla-based ineffective-assistance claim) is typically treated as eliminating the conviction for immigration purposes, while a vacatur granted solely for rehabilitative or immigration-hardship reasons generally is not. Post-conviction analysis of this kind benefits from counsel familiar with both systems.

Coordination with Immigration Proceedings

If you're facing both criminal charges and immigration court proceedings, timing matters. A criminal conviction before your immigration hearing can destroy your case. A dismissal or acquittal can strengthen it. We coordinate strategy across both systems so neither side surprises the other.

Why Novo Legal for Your Crimmigration Defense

We're not a big corporate firm that handles immigration as a side practice. We're not criminal defense attorneys who will tell you to "just go ask an immigration lawyer." We're a bilingual, community-rooted human rights firm with deep bench experience in both criminal defense and immigration law — because our community needs both.

We fight for our community. Many of our attorneys are immigrants or children of immigrants. We speak Spanish fluently — not as a service, but as the language of our homes.

We understand both systems. Our criminal defense attorneys and immigration attorneys work in the same office, on the same cases. You get a team that coordinates strategy from day one — not two separate lawyers who never talk to each other.

We take the tough cases. Aggravated felony charges. Prior deportation orders. Complicated criminal histories. Clients other firms won't touch. We've built our practice on the hard cases because those are the cases our community faces.

We know what's at stake. Your freedom. Your family. Your future in this country. We carry that weight with you, and we fight like it matters — because it does.

START YOUR DEFENSE TODAY

If you're facing criminal charges and you're worried about your immigration status, the first decisions in a case matter most. Statements to law enforcement, charging negotiations, and plea decisions made early on can have lasting immigration consequences — long before the criminal case is over.

At Novo Legal, we offer consultations for crimmigration matters. In a consultation, we walk through the charges, talk through the possible immigration consequences in general terms, and explain the options on the table. Whether to retain counsel is your decision; outcomes depend on the specific facts and applicable law. We'll tell you what we know, what we don't, and whether we're the right firm for your case — and if we're not, we'll point you to who is.

Book a consultation. Hablamos español.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a criminal charge get me deported?

It depends on the charge, your immigration status, and how the case is resolved. Some charges — "aggravated felonies" and most "crimes of moral turpitude" under federal immigration law — trigger removal even after a sentence is served, sometimes years later. Other charges may carry little or no immigration consequence, depending on the offense, the disposition, and the person's status. The shape of the plea, not just the verdict, is often what determines the immigration consequence.

What is "crimmigration" and why does it matter?

Crimmigration is the overlap between criminal law and federal immigration law. A criminal-defense attorney who is not thinking about immigration can negotiate a plea that looks good in criminal court but quietly triggers removal under the Immigration and Nationality Act. Under Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010), criminal-defense counsel has a Sixth Amendment duty to advise non-citizen clients on the immigration consequences of a plea — but compliance varies, and the safest approach is to have a defense team that practices both bodies of law on the same case.

What's the difference between a "crime of moral turpitude" and an "aggravated felony"?

Both are federal immigration-law categories, not state criminal-law categories — meaning a state misdemeanor can fall inside either category depending on how the statute is written and how the conduct is charged. "Crimes of moral turpitude" (CIMTs) generally involve fraud, dishonesty, or conduct reflecting an intent to harm. The aggravated-felony category is defined under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43) and includes some offenses that are not actually felonies under state law. It is the most consequential category in immigration law: aggravated-felony convictions generally trigger removability, foreclose most forms of discretionary relief, and trigger mandatory detention under INA § 236(c) in most cases. Whether a particular conviction falls into either category is a fact-specific legal analysis.

What happens to my green card if I plead guilty?

A guilty plea does not automatically cost a lawful permanent resident their green card, but certain plea outcomes can. A conviction in the CIMT or aggravated-felony category can put a green card holder into removal proceedings. The amount of jail time, the elements the prosecution charges, and whether the plea is to a specific subsection of a statute can all change the immigration outcome. Lawful permanent residents facing criminal charges typically need both criminal-defense and immigration analysis on the same case before any plea is entered, because the categorical analysis under federal immigration law often turns on the specific subsection of the statute charged and the sentence imposed.

Does a deferred judgment or a sealed record protect me from immigration consequences?

Not necessarily. Federal immigration law has its own definition of "conviction" under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(48)(A), and that definition is broader than what counts as a "conviction" under Colorado state law. A Colorado deferred judgment and sentence, for example, often still meets the federal definition of a conviction for immigration purposes — even if it is later dismissed under state law. Sealing or expungement of a state record generally does not erase the conviction for federal immigration purposes either. Negotiating a state-court disposition with the federal definition in mind is part of what crimmigration defense addresses up front, rather than after the plea.

Does an undocumented person have the same defense rights as a U.S. citizen?

Yes. The Sixth Amendment right to counsel, the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, and the Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures apply to everyone physically present in the United States, regardless of immigration status. Status can affect what plea options are realistic and what collateral consequences a conviction will carry — but it does not change the constitutional protections owed in the criminal case itself.

What if ICE detains me after a criminal arrest?

ICE detention after a criminal arrest is a separate federal proceeding from the underlying state criminal case. The two cases run on different tracks, in different courts, with different lawyers and different deadlines. Decisions made in the criminal case — particularly plea decisions — can directly affect bond eligibility, relief options, and the path of the immigration case. A team coordinating both the criminal and immigration sides on the same case can align plea decisions with the immigration consequences in real time, which is often harder when two attorneys are working independently across different forums. See also: What to Do if ICE Detains a Family Member in Colorado.

How does a DUI affect immigration status?

A single DUI is generally not, by itself, a crime of moral turpitude or an aggravated felony under federal immigration law. But a DUI charged with aggravating factors — a child in the car, driving on a suspended license, leaving the scene, a serious bodily injury, or a pattern of repeat offenses — can shift the analysis. DUI convictions also become highly relevant in any future immigration application as evidence of "good moral character." A first DUI is rarely the end of an immigration story; it is, however, often the start of one. See also: DUI immigration consequences — green card holders vs. undocumented.

Can a conviction be undone if it caused immigration consequences?

Sometimes. Padilla-based post-conviction relief — including motions to withdraw a plea where defense counsel failed to advise on immigration consequences — is recognized under Colorado law (see Pozo v. People and Kazadi v. People). Other vehicles include challenges to the underlying conviction on constitutional grounds or sentence reductions that bring an offense below a deportability threshold. Post-conviction relief is fact-specific and often time-limited; the earlier it is evaluated, the more options usually remain.

Should I take a plea my criminal-defense attorney recommends if I'm not a citizen?

Non-citizens generally benefit from a separate immigration-consequences review of any proposed plea before it is entered. A plea that ends a criminal case quickly can also end years of lawful presence, and the criminal court will not ordinarily flag that risk on the record. Under Padilla, defense counsel has a duty to advise non-citizen clients on the immigration consequences of a plea, but the categorical analysis is technical and the controlling precedent changes frequently — which is why a second look from counsel who practices both bodies of law is a standard part of crimmigration defense.

Do you handle cases in both English and Spanish?

Yes. Every Novo Legal attorney and client-facing staff member is bilingual in English and Spanish, and we handle crimmigration cases in either language across Colorado. Consultations are available in both languages; fees vary by case type and are explained before scheduling.

RESOURCES FROM OUR BLOG

Ready to talk?

Get help from a Novo Legal attorney.